Musings on the theory that variation in cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of divisions of normal stem cells

Abstract

Introduction - Suppose an epidemiologist had discovered an industrial agent (Agent R) that was present in the normal tissues of every person in the U.S. at concentrations that were extremely highly correlated (0.80) with the risk of cancer in those tissues. And suppose this agent was shown to be highly mutagenic. S/he would have concluded that Agent R was likely responsible for ~2/3 of the variation in cancer risk among those tissues, more than all other environmental agents and heritable factors combined. Given that cancer is known to be the result of mutations, the obvious interpretation of this discovery would be that a large fraction of the mutations responsible for cancer are caused by mutagen R. That scenario is conceptually identical to the actual one we reported in our paper. But Agent R is not exogenous, it is simply normal cell division. Every time a normal cell divides, ~3 mutations are created because of the imperfect nature of DNA copying. These mutations can be called "replicative" and are unavoidable, just as evolution is unavoidable. That they play a larger role in cancer than previously believed has important scientific and societal implications.