AarXiv13 Dec 2019Cited 63×

Effects of rearing density on growth, digestive conditions, welfare indicators and gut bacterial community of gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata, L. 1758) fed different fishmeal and fish oil dietary levels

Luca Parma, Nicole Francesca Pelusio, Enric Gisbert, María Ángeles Esteban, Federica D’Amico, Matteo Soverini, Marco Candela, Francesco Dondi, Pier Paolo Gatta, Alessio Bonaldo

Abstract

'María Ángeles Esteban' 'Federica D’Amico' 'Matteo Soverini' 'Marco Candela' 'Francesco Dondi' 'Pier Paolo Gatta' 'Alessio Bonaldo'] Parma, L., Pelusio N.F., Gisbert, E., Esteban, M.A., D'Amico, F., Soverini, M., Candela, M., Dondi, F., Gatta, P.P., Bonaldo, A. 2020. Effects of rearing density on growth, digestive conditions, welfare indicators and gut bacterial community of gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata, L. 1758) fed different fishmeal and fish oil dietary levels. Aquaculture, 518, 734850

§ The Valyu brief

The paper, in five minutes

Read from the full text via Valyu Contents

Rearing gilthead sea bream up to 44 kg/m³ with either high or low fishmeal/fish‑oil diets does not harm growth, feed efficiency, welfare or gut microbiota.

What’s new

i.Assessed combined effects of rearing density and dietary fishmeal/fish‑oil levels on growth, digestion, immunity, plasma biochemistry and gut microbiota
ii.First study to examine gut bacterial community response to density in gilthead sea bream
iii.Demonstrated that densities up to 36‑44 kg/m³ do not impair performance or welfare under both high and low FM‑FO diets
iv.Provided detailed measurements of digestive enzyme activity and skin‑mucus immune factors across densities and diets

How they did it

Triplicate groups of gilthead sea bream (initial weight 96.2 g) were reared at high and low final stocking densities and fed isonitrogenous, isolipidic extruded diets containing either high (30 % fishmeal, 15 % fish oil) or low (10 % fishmeal, 3 % fish oil) levels for 98 days under overfeeding conditions. Growth, feed efficiency, digestive enzyme activities, plasma biochemistry, skin‑mucus immune parameters and gut bacterial community composition were measured.

What they found

No significant differences in overall growth or feed efficiency between high and low densities for either diet
Digestive enzyme activity was comparable across densities and dietary treatments
Plasma biochemistry and skin‑mucus immune factors (lysozyme, protease, antiprotease, total protein) were unaffected by density
Low FM‑FO diet maintained gut bacterial biodiversity across densities, whereas high FM‑FO diet reduced biodiversity at high density
Rearing feasible up to 36‑44 kg/m³ without negative impacts on growth, feed efficiency, welfare or gut microbiota

§ The Valyu brief

Reading the full paper and taking notes. This takes a few seconds…

§ Ask this paper

Ask a question about this paper

Valyu reads the full text and answers from what the paper actually says.

§ Related work in other archives

Effects of rearing density on growth, digestive conditions, welfare indicators and gut bacterial community of gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata, L. 1758) fed different fishmeal and fish oil dietary levels

The paper, in five minutes

Ask a question about this paper

Similar papers in all four archives

The paper, in five minutes

Similar papers in all four archives