Paraphernalia
PPubMed4 Dec 2024Cited 13×

Statistical Testing of Random Number Generators and Their Improvement Using Randomness Extraction

Cameron Foreman, Richie Yeung, Florian J. Curchod, Andrei Khrennikov, Karl Svozil

Abstract

'Karl Svozil'] Random number generators (RNGs) are notoriously challenging to build and test, especially for cryptographic applications. While statistical tests cannot definitively guarantee an RNG’s output quality, they are a powerful verification tool and the only universally applicable testing method. In this work, we design, implement, and present various post-processing methods, using randomness extractors, to improve the RNG output quality and compare them through statistical testing. We begin by performing intensive tests on three RNGs-the 32-bit linear feedback shift register (LFSR), Intel’s ‘RDSEED,’ and IDQuantique’s ‘Quantis’-and compare their performance. Next, we apply the different post-processing methods to each RNG and conduct further intensive testing on the processed output. To facilitate this, we introduce a comprehensive statistical testing environment, based on existing test suites, that can be parametrised for lightweight (fast) to intensive testing.

A figure from Statistical Testing of Random Number Generators and Their Improvement Using Randomness Extraction
fig. from the paper

§ The Valyu brief

Reading the full paper and taking notes. This takes a few seconds…

§ Ask this paper

Ask a question about this paper

Valyu reads the full text and answers from what the paper actually says.

Q.

Searching the other archives…

Statistical Testing of Random Number Generators and Their Improvement Using Randomness Extraction · Paraphernalia