Paraphernalia
PPubMed7 Jun 2011Cited 26×

Making Space for Permanent Molars in Growing Baboon ( <i> Papio anubis </i> ) and Great Ape ( <i> Pan paniscus </i> and <i> P. troglodytes </i> ) Mandibles: Possible Ontogenetic Strategies and Solutions

Julia C. Boughner

Abstract

and Great Ape ( Pan paniscus and P. troglodytes ) Mandibles: Possible Ontogenetic Strategies and Solutions Authors: Julia C. Boughner While mandible proportions do not appear to constrain permanent molar initiation times, how adequate space is created in the corpus for these teeth in a timely way is not well understood. This question is important for explaining how primate tooth and jaw development and evolution are coordinated. Landmark and linear measurement data were used to characterize mandible shape, growth trajectory, and growth rate between two genera, Papio and Pan, with contrasting permanent molar initiation schedules and mandible proportions. 3D geometric morphometric and 2D bivariate analyses showed genus-level differences in mandible morphology from birth that were amplified by different postnatal growth trajectories. Different corpus proportions and regional variation in corpus growth rates helped create space in a timely way for the molars. Regional corpus growth rates may evolve alongside permanent molar morphology and developmental timing to modify space available in the corpus for these teeth.

A figure from Making Space for Permanent Molars in Growing Baboon ( <i> Papio anubis </i> ) and Great Ape ( <i> Pan paniscus </i> and <i> P. troglodytes </i> ) Mandibles: Possible Ontogenetic Strategies and Solutions
fig. from the paper

§ The Valyu brief

Reading the full paper and taking notes. This takes a few seconds…

§ Ask this paper

Ask a question about this paper

Valyu reads the full text and answers from what the paper actually says.

Q.

Searching the other archives…