Paraphernalia
PPubMed10 Nov 2020Cited 46×

Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a subgroup analysis of a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial (ATTRACTION-3)

Masanobu Takahashi, Ken Kato, Morihito Okada, Keisho Chin, Shigenori Kadowaki, Yasuo Hamamoto, Yuichiro Doki, Yutaro Kubota, Hisato Kawakami, Takashi Ogata, Hiroki Hara, Manabu Muto, Yuichiro Nakashima, Ryu Ishihara, Masahiro Tsuda, Satoru Motoyama, Mamoru Kodani, Yuko Kitagawa

Abstract

'Shigenori Kadowaki' 'Yasuo Hamamoto' 'Yuichiro Doki' 'Yutaro Kubota' 'Hisato Kawakami' 'Takashi Ogata' 'Hiroki Hara' 'Manabu Muto' 'Yuichiro Nakashima' 'Ryu Ishihara' 'Masahiro Tsuda' 'Satoru Motoyama' 'Mamoru Kodani' 'Yuko Kitagawa'] Background The efficacy and safety of nivolumab versus chemotherapy was evaluated in the Japanese subpopulation from the overall intent-to-treat (ITT) population of the ATTRACTION-3 trial conducted in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) as second-line treatment. Methods Data from Japanese patients enrolled in the multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 ATTRACTION-3 trial were analyzed. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Exploratory subgroup analyses evaluated the association between OS and stratification factors/baseline variables. Results Overall, 274 (nivolumab, 136; chemotherapy, 138) of the 419 patients in ATTRACTION-3 were enrolled from Japan: response-evaluable population (107; 108) and safety population (135; 138). OS tended to be longer in the nivolumab group versus the chemotherapy group (median: 13.4 months vs. 9.4 months; HR, 0.77; 95% CI 0.59-1.01). Median DOR was longer in the nivolumab group (7.6 months) versus the chemotherapy group (3.6 months). ORRs were similar between the nivolumab [22.4% of patients (24/107)] and chemotherapy groups [22.2% (24/108); odds ratio, 0.98; 95% CI 0.52-1.87]. DCR was lower in the nivolumab group [41.1% (44/107)] versus the chemotherapy group [66.7% (72/108)]. OS in the exploratory analysis consistently favored the nivolumab group versus the chemotherapy group. Overall, nivolumab demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety versus chemotherapy in the Japanese subpopulation, and the trend was similar to that observed in the overall ATTRACTION-3 ITT population. Conclusion Nivolumab represents a new standard second-line treatment option for Japanese patients with advanced ESCC.

A figure from Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a subgroup analysis of a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial (ATTRACTION-3)
fig. from the paper

§ The Valyu brief

Reading the full paper and taking notes. This takes a few seconds…

§ Ask this paper

Ask a question about this paper

Valyu reads the full text and answers from what the paper actually says.

Q.

Searching the other archives…