Paraphernalia
PPubMed12 Jan 2022Cited 150×

Can guidance during play enhance children’s learning and development in educational contexts? A systematic review and meta‐analysis Guided play systematic review SKENE et al.

Kayleigh Skene, Christine M. O’Farrelly, Elizabeth M. Byrne, Natalie Kirby, Eloise C. Stevens, Paul G. Ramchandani

Abstract

'Natalie Kirby' 'Eloise C. Stevens' 'Paul G. Ramchandani'] Title: Abstract This systematic review and meta-analysis considered evidence of guided play compared to direct instruction or free play to support children's learning and development. Interventions from 39 studies were reviewed (published 1977-2020); 17 were included in meta-analysis (Ntotal = 3893; Mchildage = 1-8 years; Mgirls 49.8%; Methnicity White 41%, African American/Black 28%, Hispanic 19%). Guided play had a greater positive effect than direct instruction on early maths skills (g = 0.24), shape knowledge (g = 0.63), and task switching (g = 0.40); and than free play on spatial vocabulary (g = 0.93). Differences were not identified for other key outcomes. Narrative synthesis highlighted heterogeneity in the conceptualization and implementation of guided play across studies.

A figure from Can guidance during play enhance children’s learning and development in educational contexts? A systematic review and meta‐analysis Guided play systematic review SKENE et al.
fig. from the paper

§ The Valyu brief

Reading the full paper and taking notes. This takes a few seconds…

§ Ask this paper

Ask a question about this paper

Valyu reads the full text and answers from what the paper actually says.

Q.

Searching the other archives…

Can guidance during play enhance children’s learning and development in educational contexts? A systematic review and meta‐analysis Guided play systematic review SKENE et al. · Paraphernalia