15 papers · ranked by Valyu relevance
Ulle Endriss, Umberto Grandi, Daniele Porello
We analyse the computational complexity of three problems in judgment aggregation: (1) computing a collective judgment from a profile of individual judgments (the winner determination problem); (2) deciding whether a given agent can influence the outcome of a judgment aggregation procedure in her favour by reporting…
Ronald de Haan
Judgment aggregation is a general framework for collective decision making that can be used to model many different settings. Due to its general nature, the worst case complexity of essentially all relevant problems in this framework is very high. However, these intractability results are mainly due to the fact that…
Marija Slavkovik
Reaching some form of consensus is often necessary for autonomous agents that want to coordinate their actions or otherwise engage in joint activities. One way to reach a consensus is by aggregating individual information, such as decisions, beliefs, preferences and constraints. Judgment aggregation is a social choice…
Daniele Porello
This work contributes to the theory of judgment aggregation by discussing a number of significant non-classical logics. After adapting the standard framework of judgment aggregation to cope with non-classical logics, we discuss in particular results for the case of Intuitionistic Logic, the Lambek calculus, Linear…
Jérôme Lang, Gabriella Pigozzi, Marija Slavkovik, Leendert van der Torre + 1 more
'Leendert van der Torre' 'Srdjan Vesić'] The literature on judgment aggregation is moving from studying impossibility results regarding aggregation rules towards studying specific judgment aggregation rules. Here we give a structured list of most rules that have been proposed and studied recently in the literature…
Steffen Keck, Wenjie Tang
The Benefits of Aggregating Intuitive and Analytical Judgments Authors: ['Steffen Keck' 'Wenjie Tang'] Drawing on dual-process theory, we suggest that the benefits that arise from combining several quantitative individual judgments will be heightened when these judgments are based on different cognitive processes. We…
Robert Bredereck, Junjie Luo
Aggregation with Simple Formulas Authors: ['Robert Bredereck' 'Junjie Luo'] Judgment aggregation is a framework to aggregate individual opinions on multiple, logically connected issues into a collective outcome. These opinions are cast by judges, which can be for example referees, experts, advisors or jurors, depending…
Edmond Awad, Jean‐François Bonnefon, Martin Caminada, Thomas W. Malone + 1 more
EDMOND AWAD, e Media Lab, Massachuses Institute of Technology and Masdar Institute JEAN-FRANC¸OIS BONNEFON, Toulouse School of Economics, Center for Research in Management, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse, University of Toulouse Capitole MARTIN CAMINADA, School of Computer Science & Informatics, Cardi…
Rupali S. Wagh, Deepa Anand, Fabrizio Sebastiani
The vast volume of documents available in legal databases demands effective information retrieval approaches which take into consideration the intricacies of the legal domain. Relevant document retrieval is the backbone of the legal domain. The concept of relevance in the legal domain is very complex and multi-faceted.…
Igor Douven, Nikolaus Kriegeskorte, Patrick Stinson, Josh Ying
This paper evaluates the performance of different voting and probability aggregation methods using a dataset of 451,200 probability judgments from 376 participants on 1200 general knowledge claims. We investigate the Condorcet Jury Hypothesis, according to which majority voting tends to yield outcomes more accurate…
Ashraf Labib, Salem Chakhar, Lorraine Hope, John Shimell + 1 more
'Mark Malinowski'] Title: Abstract An intelligence information system (IIS) is a particular kind of information systems (IS) devoted to the analysis of intelligence relevant to national security. Professional and military intelligence analysts play a key role in this, but their judgments can be inconsistent, mainly due…
Marvin W. Acklin, Joseph P. Velasquez
Forensic psychologists commonly utilize unstructured clinical judgment in aggregating clinical and forensic information in forming opinions. Unstructured clinical judgment is prone to evaluator bias and suboptimal levels of inter-rater reliability. This article proposes Structured Professional Judgment (SPJ) methods as…
Albert B. Kao, Andrew M. Berdahl, Andrew T. Hartnett, Matthew J. Lutz + 4 more
Aggregating multiple non-expert opinions into a collective estimate can improve accuracy across many contexts. However, two sources of error can diminish collective wisdom: individual estimation biases and information sharing between individuals. Here we measure individual biases and social influence rules in multiple…
Jordi Pujols, Valentín Iglesias, Jaime Santos, Aleksander Kuriata + 2 more
Protein aggregation propensity is a property imprinted in protein sequences and structures, being associated with the onset of human diseases and limiting the implementation of protein-based biotherapies. Computational approaches stand as cost-effective alternatives for reducing protein aggregation and increasing…
Belinda Boehm, Christopher McNeill, David Huang
Understanding the solution-phase behaviour of organic semiconducting polymers is important for systematically improving the performance of devices based on solution-processed thin films of these molecules. Conventional polymer theory predicts that polymer conformations become more compact as solvent quality decreases…